<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Asterisk Ideas and Wishlist Repository</title>
	<link>http://www.asteriskideas.org</link>
	<description>What's missing in your Asterisk? Add it to this repository!</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 02:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Execute on draft proposals from AstriDevCon 2008 and become PineMango</title>
		<link>http://www.asteriskideas.org/3rdparty/2009-03/execute-draft-proposals-astridevcon-2008-pinemango/</link>
		<comments>http://www.asteriskideas.org/3rdparty/2009-03/execute-draft-proposals-astridevcon-2008-pinemango/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 07:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jsgoecke</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[3rd party integration]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[AGI - Asterisk Gateway Interface]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[AMI - The manager interface]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Asterisk Ideas Site]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asteriskideas.org/3rdparty/2009-03/execute-draft-proposals-astridevcon-2008-pinemango/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This proposal from AstriDevCon last year in Glendale says it all:http://astridevcon.pbwiki.com/Codename-PinemangoWould like to see some movement on these ideas and know if there are any plans for Asterisk to become what is entailed in the PineMango project.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asteriskideas.org/3rdparty/2009-03/execute-draft-proposals-astridevcon-2008-pinemango/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Set debug/verbose LEVEL peer XXXX</title>
		<link>http://www.asteriskideas.org/core/2009-01/set-debugverbose-level-peer-xxxx/</link>
		<comments>http://www.asteriskideas.org/core/2009-01/set-debugverbose-level-peer-xxxx/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 09:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ibc</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Core]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asteriskideas.org/core/2009-01/set-debugverbose-level-peer-xxxx/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an Asterisk with high traffic, it&#8217;s really impossible to examine the CLI output (verbose + debug) due to the ammount of concurrent calls.It would be great the following extensions to &#8220;set debg/verbose&#8221; commands:CLI&#62; core set verbose 10 peer 2034CLI&#62; core set debug 6 peer 2034This would be great to test the dialplan behaviour by [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asteriskideas.org/core/2009-01/set-debugverbose-level-peer-xxxx/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asterisk as a Paging and Intercom system</title>
		<link>http://www.asteriskideas.org/apps/page/2008-10/asterisk-paging-intercom-system/</link>
		<comments>http://www.asteriskideas.org/apps/page/2008-10/asterisk-paging-intercom-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 06:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pathway</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Page]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Paging Intercom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asteriskideas.org/apps/page/2008-10/asterisk-paging-intercom-system/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Being a technician for a school, I would love for a less expensive, easy to setup intercom and paging system.What does an intercom/paging system include? First off, it involves the ability for a user to broadcast a voice message over a speaker system. But, it also includes the ability to send such messages to a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asteriskideas.org/apps/page/2008-10/asterisk-paging-intercom-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Match SIP peers before SIP users</title>
		<link>http://www.asteriskideas.org/channels/sip/2008-08/match-sip-peers-sip-users/</link>
		<comments>http://www.asteriskideas.org/channels/sip/2008-08/match-sip-peers-sip-users/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 17:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ibc</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[chan_sip]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[peer matching]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asteriskideas.org/channels/sip/2008-08/match-sip-peers-sip-users/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In order to avoid issues as described in bug #13296 I propose Asterisk matches before a peer (this is: matching the IP:port) than the user (mathing the &#8220;From&#8221;).It&#8217;s totally expected that a local user can&#8217;t be registered in the same IP as a SIP provider (a peer) so what I propose can&#8217;t have any negative [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asteriskideas.org/channels/sip/2008-08/match-sip-peers-sip-users/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SIP Channel Debug Filters</title>
		<link>http://www.asteriskideas.org/channels/sip/2008-08/sip-channel-debug-filters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.asteriskideas.org/channels/sip/2008-08/sip-channel-debug-filters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 17:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ctooley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[chan_sip]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[debug]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asteriskideas.org/channels/sip/2008-08/sip-channel-debug-filters/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;d love to see sip channel debug filters that let you filter on things _in_ the SIP headers.  Something along the lines of:
sip set debug cpn &#8220;7775551212&#8243; timeout 90
which prints SIP output and information for all calls with a Calling Party Number of 7775551212 for the next 90 seconds.Another option would be to turn that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asteriskideas.org/channels/sip/2008-08/sip-channel-debug-filters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Support for SIPConnect</title>
		<link>http://www.asteriskideas.org/channels/sip/2008-04/support-sipconnect/</link>
		<comments>http://www.asteriskideas.org/channels/sip/2008-04/support-sipconnect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fmenard123</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[chan_sip]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sip forum]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tcp]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asteriskideas.org/channels/sip/2008-04/support-sipconnect/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The SIP Forum has just released SIPconnect Technical Recommendation Version 1.0 on January 23, 2008.Press release: http://www.sipforum.org/content/view/297/171/Spec: http://www.sipforum.org/component/option,com_docman/task,doc_download/gid,134/Itemid,75/ The impact on Asterisk of the requirements of this specification have yet to be fully gaged. I propose that we start this topic to start going down the list of requirements for implementation of SIPconnect in *. francois@menards.ca
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asteriskideas.org/channels/sip/2008-04/support-sipconnect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enhance SIPPEER() to expose channel variables</title>
		<link>http://www.asteriskideas.org/channels/sip/2008-03/enhance-sippeer-expose-channel-variables/</link>
		<comments>http://www.asteriskideas.org/channels/sip/2008-03/enhance-sippeer-expose-channel-variables/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 07:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>oej</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Dialplan functions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[chan_sip]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asteriskideas.org/channels/sip/2008-03/enhance-sippeer-expose-channel-variables/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The SIPPER function needs to be enhanced to expose channel variables set by the peer with &#8220;setvar&#8221; in sip.conf. SIPPEER(adam,chanvar[CELLPHONE]) 
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asteriskideas.org/channels/sip/2008-03/enhance-sippeer-expose-channel-variables/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Show channels controlled by AGI or FastAGI</title>
		<link>http://www.asteriskideas.org/dev/agi/2008-02/show-channels-agi-fastagi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.asteriskideas.org/dev/agi/2008-02/show-channels-agi-fastagi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>oej</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[AGI - Asterisk Gateway Interface]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cli]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fastagi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asteriskideas.org/dev/agi/2008-02/show-channels-agi-fastagi/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When running &#8220;show channels&#8221;, there&#8217;s no difference between channels controlled by a running AGI or FastAGI script and normal channels that execute the dialplan.I would like to see visually in the CLI that a channel is controlled by AGI.  
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asteriskideas.org/dev/agi/2008-02/show-channels-agi-fastagi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Support for COPS (Common Open Policy Server)</title>
		<link>http://www.asteriskideas.org/general-networking/2008-02/cops-common-open-policy-server/</link>
		<comments>http://www.asteriskideas.org/general-networking/2008-02/cops-common-open-policy-server/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yem</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General networking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cisco]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cops]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[qos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asteriskideas.org/general-networking/2008-02/cops-common-open-policy-server/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Support for COPS would be extremely handy, since it could send COPS messages to a Policy server to enable QoS or traffic flows on routers as soon as a call is started &#8230;. And most Cisco devices support that.RFCs are 2748 and 3084
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asteriskideas.org/general-networking/2008-02/cops-common-open-policy-server/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMI over Jabber</title>
		<link>http://www.asteriskideas.org/dev/ami/2008-02/ami-xmpp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.asteriskideas.org/dev/ami/2008-02/ami-xmpp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 09:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>oej</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[AMI - The manager interface]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[res_jabber (xmpp)]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[jabber]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[manager]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asteriskideas.org/dev/ami/2008-02/ami-xmpp/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interfacing the AMI manager port to the xmpp/jabber resource module would lead to many things.

Manager multicast - sending AMI events to a jabber conference room for multicasting to multiple clients
Manager unicast - sending AMI events to &#8220;buddies&#8221; as messages
Manager &#8220;chat sessions&#8221; for action/response handling

 Jabber is a scalable messaging infrastructure that&#8217;s already in place. Do you [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asteriskideas.org/dev/ami/2008-02/ami-xmpp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
